Articles · Vol. 31 No. 4 (2006): Africa Development

6 - How to Research the Changing Outlines of African Livelihoods

by Leo J. de Haan & Annelies Zoomers

Vol. 31 · 2006 No. 4 Africa Development AD

Abstract

This paper examines how to research the changing outlines of African liveli- hoods in the present era of globalisation. After an analysis of the historical and theoretical context in which the modern livelihood approach developed, two trends in modern livelihood studies are discussed, i.e. its increased holistic features and the surmounting of its micro-orientation. Subsequently, the most pressing issues in livelihood research are reviewed: decomposition of house- holds, and the increased diversification and increased multi-locality of liveli- hoods under globalisation. The next section focuses on two major theoretical and methodological challenges facing the livelihood approach at present. First, with respect to the problem of access, we will demonstrate that the livelihood approach can become more powerful analytically by improving its theoretical depth through incorporating valuable elements of sovereignty and power. Sec- ond, there is the access to livelihood opportunities in relation to decision-mak- ing. In this context, we review various relevant concepts, such as livelihood strategies and styles, in order to operationalise the improved theoretical depth. We then propose livelihood trajectories as an appropriate methodology for ex- amining pathways of African livelihoods. In doing so, the paper also suggests an agenda for future research on African livelihoods.

Statistics

Abstract views
182
Downloads
69

References

  1. Ahmad, E., J. Dreze & Hills, J., 1991, Social Security in Developing Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  2. Amalric, F., 1998, The Sustainable Livelihoods Approach. General Report of the
  3. Sustainable Livelihoods Project 1995-1997, Rome: SID.
  4. Appendini, K., 2001, ‘Land and Livelihood: What Do We Know, and What Are the Issues?’, in A.
  5. Zoomers, ed., Land and Sustainable Livelihood in Latin America, pp. 23-38, Amsterdam: Royal
  6. Tropical Institute/Vervuert Verlag.
  7. Arce, A. & Hebinck, P. 2002, ‘Life Styles and the Livelihood Framework: Problems and Possibilities
  8. for Development Studies’, Unpublished paper, Wageningen: Department of Social Sciences, Rural
  9. Development Sociology.
  10. Arce, A., 2003, ‘Value Contestations in Development Interventions: Community Development and
  11. Sustainable Livelihood Approaches’, Community Development Journal, 38, 3, pp. 199-212.
  12. Bebbington, A., 1999, ‘Capitals and Capabilities: a Framework for Analysing Peasant Viability,
  13. Rural Livelihoods and Poverty’, World Development 27, 12, pp. 2021-2044.
  14. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B. 1994, At Risk. Natural Hazards, People’s
  15. Vulnerability and Disasters, London: Routledge.
  16. Bourdieu, P., 1980, The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  17. Breusers, M., 2001, ‘Pathways to Negotiate Climate Variability. Land Use and Institutional Change
  18. in the Kaya Region, Burkina Faso’, Research Report 63, Leiden: African Studies Centre.
  19. Carney, D., ed., 1998, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods. What Contribution Can we Make?, Department of
  20. International Development, Nottingham: Russell Press Ltd.
  21. Chambers, R. & Conway, G.., 1992, ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st
  22. Century’, Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: IDS.
  23. De Bruijn, M. & van Dijk, H. 2003, ‘Pathways and Habitus: a Framework for the Analysis of
  24. Decision-making in High-risk Environments’, Unpublished paper, Leiden: African Studies Centre.
  25. De Haan, L., 1993, La Region des Savanes au Togo. L’État, les paysans et l’integration regionale 1885-1985, Paris: Karthala.
  26. De Haan, L., 2000, ‘Globalization, Localization and Sustainable Livelihood’,
  27. Sociologia Ruralis 40, 3, pp. 339-365.
  28. De Haas, H., 2001, ‘Migration, Development and Agricultural Change in the South- Moroccan Todgha
  29. Valley’, The Arab World Geographer 4, 4, pp. 302-320.
  30. De Ruijter, A., 1997, ‘The Era of Glocalisation’, in Van Naerssen, T, M. Rutten and
  31. A. Zoomers, eds , The Diversity of Development. Essays in Honour of Jan Kleinpenning, Assen, Van Gorcum, pp. 381-388.
  32. Devereux, S., 2001, ‘Livelihood Insecurity and Social Protection: a Re-emerging Issue in Rural
  33. Development’, Development Policy Review 19, 4, pp. 507-519. Ellis, F., 1998, ‘Survey Article:
  34. Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood
  35. Diversification’, Journal of Development Studies, 35, 1, pp. 1-38.
  36. Ellis, F., 2000, Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Farrington, J., D. Carney, C. Ashley & C. Turton, 1999, Sustainable Livelihoods in Practice. Early
  38. Applications of Concepts in Rural Areas, London: ODI
  39. Natural Resources Perspectives, 42.
  40. Francis, E., 1992, ‘Qualitative Research: Collecting Life Histories’, in S. Devereux & J.
  41. Hoddinott, Fieldwork in Developing Countries, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 86-101.
  42. Gore, C., 1994, ‘Social Exclusion and Africa South of the Sahara: A Review of the Literature’,
  43. International Institute for Labour Studies. Labour Institutions and Development Programme DP 62, Geneva: ILO.
  44. Granovetter, M., 1983, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited’, in P. Marsden and
  45. N. Lin, eds., Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 105-30.
  46. Guyer, J. & Peters, P., 1987, ‘Introduction. Conceptualizing the Household: Issues of Theory and
  47. Policy in Africa’, Development and Change Special Issue 18, 2, pp. 197-214.
  48. Hoon, P., Singh, N. & Wanmali, S., 1997, ‘Sustainable Livelihoods: Concepts, Principles and
  49. Approaches to Indicator Development’, Paper presented at the workshop Sustainable Livelihood
  50. Indicators, Social Development and Poverty Eradication Division. New York: UNDP.
  51. Humphries, J., 1982, ‘The Family and Economy: Notes towards a Relative Autonomy Approach’, Paper
  52. presented at the conference on demographic research in Latin America, Linking Individual, Household
  53. and Societal Variables. Ixtapan de la Sal: Social Sciences Research Council Mexico.
  54. Johnston, R., 1993, Geography and Geographers. Anglo-American Human Geography since 1945, 4th
  55. Edition, London: Edward Arnold.
  56. Kaag, M., van Berkel, R., Brons, J., et al., 2004, ‘Ways Forward in Livelihood Research’. In: D.
  57. Kalb, W. Pansters and H. Siebers, Globalization and Development. Themes and Concepts in Current
  58. Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  59. pp. 49-74
  60. Kabeer, N., 1994, Reversed Realities. Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought, London: Verso.
  61. Leach, M., Mearns, R & Scoones, I., 1999, ‘Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in
  62. Community-based Natural Resource Management’, World Development, 27, 2, pp. 225-247.
  63. Long, N., 1997, ‘Agency and Constraint, Perceptions and Practices. A Theoretical Position’, in H.
  64. de Haan & N. Long, eds., Images and Realities of Rural Life,
  65. pp. 1-20, Assen: Van Gorcum.
  66. Long, N., 1984, Family and Work in Rural Societies, London: Tavistock Publications.
  67. Moser, C., 1998, ‘The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction
  68. Strategies’, World Development, 26,1, pp. 1-19.
  69. Nooteboom. G., 2003, A Matter of Style: Social Security and Livelihood in Upland East Java, Amsterdam: Rozenberg.
  70. North, D., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance,
  71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Olivier de Sardan, J.-P. and Bierschenk, T. 1994, ‘ECRIS: Enquête Collective Rapide
  73. d’Identification des conflits et des groupes stratégiqies’, Bulletin APAD, 7,pp. 35-43.
  74. Robertson, R., 1995, ‘Glocalisation: Time-space and Homogeneity-heterogeneity’, in M. Featherstone,
  75. S. Lash and R. Robertson, eds., Global Modernities, London, Sage, pp. 25-44.
  76. Rowlands, J., 1997, Questioning Empowerment. Working with Women in Honduras, Oxford: Oxfam
  77. Publications.
  78. Schmink, M., 1984, ‘Household Economic Strategies: Review and Research Agenda’,
  79. Latin American Research Review 19, 3, pp. 87-101.
  80. Scoones, I. and Wormer, W. 2002, Pathways of Change in Africa. Crops, Livestock and Livelihoods in
  81. Mali, Ethiopia and Zimbabwe, Oxford: James Currey.
  82. Scoones, I., 1998, ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis’, Working Paper
  83. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton: IDS.
  84. Scott, J., 1991, ‘Gender a Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, in R. Aruna, ed.,
  85. Women’s Studies International. Nairobi and Beyond, New York: Feminist Press.pp. 13-37.
  86. Sen, A., 1981, Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  87. Sen, A., 1985, Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  88. Solesbury, W., 2003a, Sustainable Livelihoods: A Case Study of the Evolution of DFID Policy, London: ODI.
  89. Solesbury, W., 2003b, ‘The Sustainable Livelihoods Case Study’, Bridging Research and Policy
  90. Seminar, Transcript of presentation 9 October 2003, London: ODI. Villareal, M., 1994, Wielding and
  91. Yielding. Power, Subordination and Gender Identity in the Context of a Mexican Development Project, Wageningen: Wageningen University.
  92. Von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K. Casino, E. Hirtz, F. G. Woodman & Zacher, H. eds.,
  93. , Between Kinship and the State: Social Security and Law in Developing Countries, Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
  94. Wallmann, S., 1984, Eight London Households, London: Routledge.