Numéro

Vol. 31 No 2 (2006): Afrique et développement: Special Issue Decentralisation and Livelihoods in Africa

3 - From Paternalism to Real Partnership with Local Communities? Experiences from Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda)

https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v31i2.1140
Agrippinah Namara

Corresponding Author(s) : Agrippinah Namara

agrip_namara@hotmail.com

Afrique et développement, Vol. 31 No 2 (2006): Afrique et développement: Special Issue Decentralisation and Livelihoods in Africa

Résumé




3.Namara.p65




Africa Development, Vol. XXXI, No. 2, 2006, pp. 37–66
© Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa, 2006


(ISSN 0850-3907)


From Paternalism to Real Partnership with Local Communities? Experiences from Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda)


Agrippinah Namara*


Abstract


Conserving and sustainably managing Uganda’s wildlife and protected areas in partnership with neighbouring communities and other stakeholders for the benefit of the people of Uganda and the global community is the expressed mission of the Uganda Wildlife Authority. This article explores the form that conservation partnerships between the central government, local government and communities are taking in Uganda’s wildlife sector. Are these partnerships paving the way from the paternalistic approach to protected area management to partnerships between the wildlife authorities and local communities that are beneficial to both groups? To what extent are institutions representing the local community able to advance local interests and contribute to decision making on wildlife management within these partnerships? Are we moving towards democratic natural resource management? These are the questions that this article ponders.


Résumé


La mission du Service Ougandais de la Faune est de conserver et de gérer durablement la faune et les aires protégées en partenariat avec les communautés riveraines et d’autres parties prenantes, ceci pour le bénéfice des Ougandais et de la communauté internationale. Cet article explore les mécanismes qui émergent du partenariat entre le gouvernement central, les communes (ou les conseils locaux) et les communautés locales dans le domaine de la gestion de la faune en Ouganda. Ce partenariat se déplace-t-il des approches paternalistes de gestion des aires protégées vers une approche collaborative entre les autorités du Service de la Faune et les communautés locales bénéfique tant à ces dernières qu’à la conservation? Jusqu’où les institutions représentant les communautés locales sont-elles capables de défendre les intérêts locaux et participer à la prise de décision à l’intérieur d’une gestion collaborative? Evoluons-nous vers une gestion démocratique des ressources naturelles? Autant de questions sur lesquelles réfléchit cet article.


Agrippinah Namara, Consultant in natural resource management, Kampala, Uganda. Email: agrip_namara@hotmail.com




[1]
Namara, A. 2006. 3 - From Paternalism to Real Partnership with Local Communities? Experiences from Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda). Afrique et développement. 31, 2 (janv. 2006). DOI:https://doi.org/10.57054/ad.v31i2.1140.
Télécharger la référence bibliographique
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Les références
  1. Adams, W. and Hulme, D., 2001, ‘Conservation and Community. Changing Narratives, Policies and
  2. Practices in African Conservation’, in D. Hulme and
  3. M. Murphree, eds., African Wildlife and Livelihoods. The Promise and Performance of Community
  4. Conservation, Oxford, James Currey.
  5. Agrawal, A. and Ribot, J.C., 1999, ‘Accountability in Decentralisation: A framework with South
  6. Asian and West African Cases’, Journal of Developing Areas, 33, pp. 473-502.
  7. Barrow, E., Gichohi, H., and Infield, M., 2000, ‘Summary and Key Lessons from a Comparative Review
  8. of Community Conservation in East Africa’, Working Paper No. 2, Nairobi, IUCN-EAPO.
  9. Barrow, E. and Murphree, M., 2001, ‘Community Conservation. From Concept to Practice’, in D.Hulme
  10. and M. Murphree, eds., African Wildlife and Livelihoods. The Promise and Performance of Community
  11. Conservation, Oxford, James Currey.
  12. Barrow, E. and Fabricius, C., 2002, ‘Do Rural People Really Benefit from Protected Areas-rhetoric
  13. or Reality?’, Parks, 12(2), pp. 67-79.
  14. Bazaara, N., 2006, ‘Subjecting Nature to Central Authority: The Struggle over Public Goods in the
  15. Formation of Citizenship’, Africa Development, Vol. XXXI, No. 2.
  16. Blomley, T., 2003, ‘Natural Resource Conflict Management: The Case of Bwindi Impenetrable and
  17. Mgahinga Gorilla National Parks, South Western Uganda’, in Natural Resource Conflict Management
  18. Case Studies: An Analysis of Power, pp 231-50, Rome, FAO Community Forestry Unit.
  19. Blomley, T., Franks, P. and Kabugenda, A., 2002, ‘Towards “Institutional Landscapes”? Biodiversity
  20. Conservation within the Context of Decentralised Governance’, in Schultz, P. and Noppen, D., eds.,
  21. The Landscape Approach: Learning from North to South, Copenhagen, Environment and Development
  22. Blomley, T. and Namara, A., 2003, ‘Devolving Rights or Shedding responsibilities? Community
  23. Conservation in Uganda over the Last Decade’, Policy Matters, 12, pp. 283-89.
  24. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. and Sandwith, T., 2003, ‘Editorial’, Parks, 13(1), pp 1-5. Butynski, T.M.,
  25. , ‘Ecological Survey of the Impenetrable (Bwindi) Forest,
  26. Uganda, and Recommendations for its Conservation and Management’, Report to the Government of
  27. Uganda, New York, Wildlife Conservation International. CARE-Uganda, 1998, ‘An Institutional
  28. Framework for the Management of Environment and Natural Resources in Kabale, Kisoro and Rukungiri
  29. Districts
  30. of South-West Uganda’, Unpublished report, Kampala, CARE-Uganda.
  31. Chhetri, P., A. Mugisha and White, S., 2003, ‘Community Resource Use in Kibale and Mt Elgon
  32. National Parks, Uganda’, Parks, 13(1), pp 28-38.
  33. ITFC (Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation), 2004, ‘Bwindi and Mgahinga National Parks in
  34. Uganda: Has 15 years of ICD Programming Succeeded in Increasing Support for Conservation among
  35. Local Communities?’, Report of an assessment study of selected Integrated Conservation and
  36. Development strategies implemented in BINP and MGNP, Kabale, Uganda, ITFC.
  37. Leach, M. and Fairhead, J., 2001, ‘Plural Perspectives and Institutional Dynamics: Challenges for
  38. Local Forest Management’, International Journal of Agriculture, Resources, Governance and Ecology,
  39. (3/4), pp.223-42.
  40. Madden, F., 1998, ‘“The Problem Gorilla”, A report of the East and Central African Workshop on
  41. problem mountain gorillas using the situation in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park as a basis for
  42. solution development’, Unpublished paper, International Gorilla Conservation Project/CARE-Uganda,
  43. Kampala. Mandondo A., 2000, ‘Situating Zimbabwe’s Natural Resource Governance Systems in History’,
  44. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 32, Bogor, Center for International Forestry Research.
  45. MTWA (Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry), 1996, ‘Outputs of the Taskforce on Collaborative
  46. Management for The Uganda Wildlife Authority’, Report, Kampala, MTWA.
  47. Namara, A., Gray, M. and McNeilage, A., 2001, ‘People and Bwindi Forest. Historical Account as
  48. Given by Local Community Members’, Unpublished report, Nairobi and Kabale, Uganda, WWF-EARPO and
  49. Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation.
  50. Namara, A. and Nsabagasani, X., 2003, ‘Decentralisation and Wildlife Management: Devolving Rights
  51. or shedding responsibility? Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda’, Working Paper No. 9,
  52. Environmental Governance in Africa Series, Washington, D.C., World Resources Institute.
  53. Oyono, P.R., 2004, ‘One step forward, two step back? Paradoxes of natural resource management
  54. decentralization in Cameroon’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(1), pp. 91-111.
  55. Pimbert, M.P. and Pretty, J.N., 1995, ‘Parks, people and professionals: Putting Participation into
  56. Protected Area Management’, UNRISD/IIED/WWF-
  57. International Discussion Paper 57, Geneva, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
  58. Republic of Uganda, 1994, The Uganda National Environment Policy, Kampala, Ministry of Land, Water
  59. and Mineral Development.
  60. Republic of Uganda, 1995a, National Environment Statute, Entebbe, Government Printer.
  61. Republic of Uganda, 1995b, The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Entebbe, Government Printer.
  62. Republic of Uganda, 1995c, The Uganda Wildlife Policy, Kampala, Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry.
  63. Republic of Uganda. 1996, The Uganda Wildlife Statute, Entebbe, Government Printer.
  64. Republic of Uganda, 1997, The Local Government Act, Entebbe, Government Printer.
  65. Republic of Uganda, 1999, The Uganda Wildlife Policy, Kampala, Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry.
  66. Ribot, J.C., 1999, ‘Decentralisation, Participation and Accountability in Sahelian Forestry: Legal
  67. Instruments of Political-Administrative Control’, Africa, 69(1),pp. 23-64.
  68. Ribot, J.C., 2002, ‘African Decentralization: Local Actors, Powers and Accountability’, Democracy,
  69. Governance, and Human Rights, Paper No. 8, Washington D.C., United Nations Research Institute for
  70. Social Development.
  71. Ribot, J.C., 2002, ‘Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources. Institutionalizing Popular
  72. Participation’, WRI Research Report, Washington, D.C., World Resources Institute.
  73. Sundar, Nandini, 2000, ‘Unpacking the “Joint” in Joint Forest Management’,
  74. Development and Change, 31(1), pp. 255-79.
  75. Uganda National Parks, 1995, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park: Management Plan 1995-1999, Kampala,
  76. Uganda Wildlife Authority.
  77. UWA (Uganda Wildlife Authority), 1996, ‘Memorandum of Understanding Between Uganda Wildlife
  78. Authority—Bwindi Impenetrable National Park and The people of Nyamabare Parish, Ikumba Sub-County,
  79. Kabale District, An agreement concerning Collaborative Beekeeping’ (Forest Resource Use) in The
  80. Park, Kampala, Uganda Wildlife Authority.
  81. UWA, 2000a, Revenue Sharing Around Protected Areas, Kampala, Uganda Wildlife Authority.
  82. UWA, 2000b, Uganda Wildlife Authority Collaborative Management Strategy, Kampala, Uganda Wildlife Authority.
  83. UWA, 2000c, Community-Protected Area Institution Policy, Kampala, Uganda Wildlife Authority.
  84. UWA, 2001, ‘Collaborative Management within Uganda Wildlife Authority’, Report of the Senior Staff
  85. Retreat held at Ranch on the Lake Hotel, Uganda
  86. Wildlife Authority, 2nd June 2001, Kampala.
Read More

Biographie de l'auteur

Agrippinah Namara

 Consultant in natural resource management, Kampala, Uganda.

Télécharger ce document PDF
PDF (ENGLISH)
Statistic
Read Counter : 107 Download : 51

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.